Respiratory muscle training with electronic devices in the postoperative period of hepatectomy: A randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have been developed with a focus on surgical techniques and drugs, but few that address the importance of rehabilitation in the pre and postoperative period, and the specific benefits for each surgical procedure or type of neoplasm, aiming to minimize respiratory complications in the postoperative period. AIM: To compare the strength of the respiratory muscles in the pre and postoperative periods of hepatectomy by laparotomy and to verify the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications among the groups studied. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, clinical trial study that compared the inspiratory muscle training group (GTMI) with the control group (CG). After the collection of sociodemographic and clinical data, in both groups, preoperatively, on the first and fifth postoperative days, vital signs and pulmonary mechanics were evaluated and recorded. Albumin and bilirubin values were recorded for the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score. After randomization and allocation of participants, those in the CG underwent conventional physical therapy and those in the GTMI underwent conventional physical therapy plus inspiratory muscle, in both groups for five postoperative days. RESULTS: Of 76 subjects met eligibility criteria. The collection of 41 participants was completed: 20 in the CG and 21 in the GTMI. The most frequent diagnosis was 41.5% with liver metastasis, followed by 26.8% with hepatocellular carcinoma. As for respiratory complications in the GTMI, there was no incidence. In the CG, there were three respiratory complications. Patients in the CG classified as ALBI score 3 presented, statistically, a higher energy value compared to patients classified as ALBI score 1 and 2 (P = 0.0187). Respiratory variables, measured preoperatively and on the first postoperative day, had a significant drop in both groups from the preoperative to the first postoperative day (P ≤ 0.0001). When comparing the preoperative period and the fifth postoperative day between the GTMI and the CG, the maximal inspiratory pressure variable in the GTMI was statistically significant (P = 0.0131). CONCLUSION: All respiratory measures showed a reduction in the postoperative period. Respiratory muscle training using the Powerbreathe® device increased maximal inspiratory pressure and this may have contributed to a shorter hospital stay and better clinical outcome.

Avaliação da capacidade física em pacientes hospitalizados com diagnóstico de COVID-19 / Evaluación de la capacidad física en pacientes hospitalizados por Covid-19 / Physical capacity assessment in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 diagnose

RESUMO A infecção por SARS-CoV-2 pode ocasionar a síndrome respiratória aguda grave (SRAG), levando a hipoxemia. A avaliação da capacidade física pode ser realizada anteriormente à alta hospitalar, através de testes de exercícios submáximos. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a capacidade física e a tolerância ao exercício físico por meio do teste de degrau de seis minutos (TD6) em pacientes hospitalizados com diagnóstico de COVID-19 que fizeram uso de suporte de oxigênio (O2) durante a internação. Trata-se de um estudo prospectivo e intervencionista, incluindo pacientes com idade entre 18 e 90 anos, que necessitaram de oxigenoterapia durante a hospitalização. Foi realizada avaliação através do Perme escore, seguida do TD6, com análise da saturação periférica de oxigênio (SpO2), frequência cardíaca (FC), pressão arterial (PA) e percepção subjetiva do esforço através da escala de Borg, antes e imediatamente após o TD6. Foram avaliados 31 pacientes, com idade média de 51,9 anos. O dispositivo de O2 mais utilizado foi o cateter nasal (CN), em 64,5% dos pacientes. Em relação à FC, PA e escala de Borg, pudemos observar um aumento no valor médio dessas variáveis após o TD6. A SpO2 teve uma média menor quando comparada à avaliação inicial do TD6. O teste foi finalizado por 86,9% dos pacientes, sendo que, destes, 48,3% finalizaram com interrupções; 12,9% dos participantes suspenderam o teste. O TD6 foi capaz de avaliar a capacidade física e a tolerância ao exercício, tornando-se uma ferramenta eficaz para avaliação do paciente com COVID-19.

RESUMEN La infección por SARS-CoV-2 puede provocar el síndrome respiratorio agudo severo (SRAS), resultando en hipoxemia. La evaluación de la capacidad física se puede realizar antes del alta hospitalaria mediante pruebas de ejercicio submáximas. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la capacidad física y la tolerancia al ejercicio a través del test de escalón de seis minutos (TE6) en pacientes hospitalizados por Covid-19 que utilizaron soporte de oxígeno (O2) durante la hospitalización. Se trata de un estudio prospectivo e intervencionista, en el que se incluyeron a pacientes con edades entre los 18 y los 90 años, que necesitaron la oxigenoterapia durante su hospitalización. La evaluación se realizó mediante el puntaje de Perme, seguido del TE6, con análisis de saturación de oxígeno periférico (SpO2), frecuencia cardíaca (FC), presión arterial (PA) y esfuerzo percibido mediante la escala de Borg, antes e inmediatamente después del TE6. Se evaluaron a 31 pacientes, con una edad media de 51,9 años. El dispositivo de O2 más utilizado fue el catéter nasal (CN) por el 64,5% de los pacientes. Con relación a la FC, PA y la escala de Borg, se observa un aumento en el valor medio de estas variables después del TE6. La SpO2 tuvo una media más baja en comparación con la evaluación inicial del TE6. El 86,9% de los pacientes completaron el test, de los cuales el 48,3% terminó con interrupciones; y el 12,9% lo suspendió. El TE6 pudo evaluar la capacidad física y la tolerancia al ejercicio, lo que resulta ser una herramienta eficaz para evaluar a los pacientes con Covid-19.

ABSTRACT SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), leading to hypoxemia. Physical capacity assessment can be performed before hospital discharge using submaximal exercise testing. This study sought to assess physical capacity and exercise tolerance with the six-minute step test (6MST) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who required oxygen (O2) support during hospitalization. A prospective, interventional study was conducted with patients aged from 18 to 90 years who required oxygen therapy during hospitalization. Assessment was performed using Perme Score, followed by the 6MST tests, assessing the peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and subjective exertion perception by Borg Scale, before and immediately after the 6MST. A total of 31 patients, with a mean age of 51.9 years, were evaluated. Nasal cannula (NC) was the most used device (64.5% of patients). Regarding HR, BP, and Borg Scale, their mean value increased after 6MST. SpO2 showed a lower mean value after 6MST. Out of the 86.9% of patients who completed the test, 48.3% completed it with interruptions, and 12.9% had to suspend it. The 6MST was able to assess physical capacity and exercise tolerance, proving to be an effective tool for evaluating COVID-19 patients.

Avaliação pré-operatória da força muscular respiratória, da função pulmonar e da capacidade funcional de pacientes submetidos a ressecção pulmonar / Preoperative evaluation of respiratory muscle strength, lung function andfunctional capacity of patients undergoing lung resection

INTRODUÇÃO: As neoplasias pulmonares podem causar deterioração na função pulmonar e capacidade funcional, prejudicando a evolução do paciente após cirurgia de ressecção. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a força muscular respiratória, a função pulmonar e a capacidade funcional de pacientes no pré-operatório de ressecção pulmonar por neoplasia, comparar aos valores de normalidade e por estadiamento. MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos pacientes na faixa etária de 30 a 80 anos com diagnóstico de neoplasia de pulmão que aguardavam cirurgia de ressecção pulmonar. A avaliação pré-operatória incluiu medida de força muscular respiratória por manovacuometria, função pulmonar por espirometria e capacidade funcional pelo teste de caminhadados seis minutos (TC6). Os valores obtidos foram comparados aos valores preditos pela literatura e comparados os estadiamentos inicial e avançado. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados 59 pacientes com idade média de 58,5±9,46 anos. Houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre obtido e predito, respectivamente, para os valores de pressão expiratória máxima (PEmáx): 91 e 111,8 cmH2O; capacidade vital forçada (CVF): 3,14 e 4,08 L; volume expiratório forçado no primeiro segundo (VEF1): 2,42 e 3,12 L; razão VEF1/CVF: 75 e 101%; e capacidade funcional: 453,9 e 562,9 m, sendo que os pacientes apresentaram valores inferiores aos preditos pela literatura, exceto a CVF. Não houve diferença para a pressão inspiratória máxima (PImáx): 110 e 102 cmH2O. Entre os grupos de estadiamento houve diferença apenas para a CVF (inicial: 2,89; avançado: 3,41 L). CONCLUSÃO: Os pacientes com diagnóstico de neoplasia pulmonar em pré-operatório de ressecção possuem prejuízos na força muscular expiratória, na função pulmonar e na capacidade funcional.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer can cause deterioration in lung function and functional capacity, impairing patient outcome after resection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the respiratory muscle strength, lung function and functional capacity of patients in preoperative of lung resection for cancer, compared to normal values and staging. METHODS: Patients of both genders were includedaged 30-80 years with a diagnosis of lung cancer awaiting pulmonary resection surgery. Preoperative evaluation included measurement of respiratory muscle strength by manometer, lung function by spirometry and functional capacity through the sixminute walk test (6MWT). The values obtained were compared with predicted values obtained from equations proposed in the literature and compared the staging initial and advanced.RESULTS: 59 patients with a mean age of 58.5±9.46 years were evaluated. There was a statistically significant difference between the obtained and the predicted values for maximum expiratory pressure (MEP): respectively 91 and 111.8 cmH2O, forced vital capacity (FVC): 3.14 and 4.08 L; forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1): 2.42 and 3.12 L; FEV1/FVC:75 and 101%; and functional capacity: 453.9 and 562.9 m, in which the patients had lower values than those predicted by the literature, except FVC. There was no difference for inspiratory muscle strength (MIP: 110 and 102 cmH2O). Among the groups of patients only showed a difference of FVC (initial: 2.89; advanced: 3.41 L). CONCLUSION: Patients diagnosed with lung cancer in preoperative of resection, have impairments in expiratory musclestrength, lung function and functional capacity.

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) after lung resection: a randomized clinical trial.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive mechanical ventilation during the postoperative period (PO) following lung resection can restore residual functional capacity, improve oxygenation and spare the inspiratory muscles. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) associated with physiotherapy, compared with physiotherapy alone after lung resection. DESIGN AND SETTING: Open randomized clinical trial conducted in the clinical hospital of Universidade Estadual de Campinas. METHOD: Sessions were held in the immediate postoperative period (POi) and on the first and second postoperative days (PO1 and PO2), and the patients were reassessed on the discharge day. CPAP was applied for two hours and the pressure adjustment was set between 7 and 8.5 cmH2O. The oxygenation index (OI), Borg scale, pain scale and presence of thoracic drains and air losses were evaluated. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the OI in the CPAP group in the POi compared to the Chest Physiotherapy (CP) group, P = 0.024. In the CP group the OI was significantly lower on PO1 (P = 0,042), than CPAP group. The air losses were significantly greater in the CPAP group in the POi and on PO1 (P = 0.001, P = 0.028), but there was no significant difference between the groups on PO2 and PO3. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the Borg scale in the POi (P < 0.001), but there were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding the pain score. CONCLUSION: CPAP after lung resection is safe and improves oxygenation, without increasing the air losses through the drains. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01285648.

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) after lung resection: a randomized clinical trial / Pressao positiva continua nas vias aereas (CPAP) apos resseccao pulmonar: ensaio clinico randomizado

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive mechanical ventilation during the postoperative period (PO) following lung resection can restore residual functional capacity, improve oxygenation and spare the inspiratory muscles. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) associated with physiotherapy, compared with physiotherapy alone after lung resection. DESIGN AND SETTING: Open randomized clinical trial conducted in the clinical hospital of Universidade Estadual de Campinas. METHOD: Sessions were held in the immediate postoperative period (POi) and on the first and second postoperative days (PO1 and PO2), and the patients were reassessed on the discharge day. CPAP was applied for two hours and the pressure adjustment was set between 7 and 8.5 cmH2O. The oxygenation index (OI), Borg scale, pain scale and presence of thoracic drains and air losses were evaluated. RESULTS : There was a significant increase in the OI in the CPAP group in the POi compared to the Chest Physiotherapy (CP) group, P = 0.024. In the CP group the OI was significantly lower on PO1 (P = 0,042), than CPAP group. The air losses were significantly greater in the CPAP group in the POi and on PO1 (P = 0.001, P = 0.028), but there was no significant difference between the groups on PO2 and PO3. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the Borg scale in the POi (P < 0.001), but there were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding the pain score. CONCLUSION: CPAP after lung resection is safe and improves oxygenation, without increasing the air losses through the drains. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01285648 .

CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: A ventilação mecânica não invasiva no período pós-operatório (PO) de ressecção pulmonar pode restaurar a capacidade residual funcional, melhorar a oxigenação e poupar os músculos inspiratórios. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a eficácia da CPAP associada à fisioterapia comparada à fisioterapia unicamente após ressecção pulmonar. ESTUDO E LOCAL: Ensaio clínico randomizado aberto, realizado no Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas. MÉTODO: Os atendimentos foram realizados nos PO imediato (POi), primeiro e segundo (PO1, PO2) dias, e a reavaliação na alta hospitalar. A CPAP foi aplicada durante duas horas e o ajuste pressórico estabelecido entre 7 e 8,5 cmH2O. Foram analisados índice de oxigenação (IO), escala de Borg e de dor, presença e perda aérea dos drenos torácicos. RESULTADOS: No grupo CPAP ocorreu aumento significativo do IO no POi (P = 0,024), comparado com o grupo fisioterapia respiratória. Houve redução significativa do IO no PO1 (P = 0,042) para o grupo fisioterapia respiratória, comparando-se à CPAP. A perda aérea foi significativamente maior para o grupo CPAP no POi e PO1 (0,001; 0,028), mas nos PO2 e no PO3 não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos. Foi verificada diferença significativa entre os grupos para a escala de Borg no POi (P < 0,001), porém para a escala de dor não foram verificadas diferenças significativas entre os grupos. CONCLUSÃO: A CPAP após ressecção pulmonar é segura e melhora a oxigenação sem aumentar a perda aérea pelos drenos. REGISTRO DE ENSAIO CLÍNICO: NCT01285648 .